1998 Ford Telstar vs. 2010 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1998 Ford Telstar. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 328 kg more than 1998 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Telstar. (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Telstar.

Compare all specifications: