1998 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 429 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |
