1998 Ford Tracer vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Tracer would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (201 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1998 Ford Tracer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 539 kg more than 1998 Ford Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (281 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Tracer. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Tracer | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Tracer | Sable |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 281 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |