1998 Ford Triton vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Ford Triton is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Triton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Triton (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Triton weights approximately 142 kg more than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Triton (174 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Triton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Triton | 1979 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Triton | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2520 mm |