1998 Ford Triton vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 Ford Triton is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Triton (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Triton weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Triton | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Triton | Celica |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 215 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2640 mm |