1998 Ford Triton vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 1998 Ford Triton is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Triton is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Triton weights approximately 187 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Triton has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Triton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Triton | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Triton | 626 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2520 mm |
