1998 Ford Triton vs. 2000 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 418 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Triton | 2000 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Ford | Lancia |
| Model | Triton | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2830 mm |
