1998 Ford Triton vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (207 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Triton | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Triton | 6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2680 mm |