1998 Ford Triton vs. 2003 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 393 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Triton | 2003 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Triton | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2750 mm |
