1998 Ford Triton vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (230 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Triton | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Triton | C70 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 190 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2650 mm |
