1998 Ford Triton vs. 2010 BMW 320
To start off, 2010 BMW 320 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 1,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Triton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton.
Because 2010 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 320 (380 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2010 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Triton | 2010 BMW 320 | |
| Make | Ford | BMW |
| Model | Triton | 320 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4624 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2810 mm |
