1998 Ford Triton vs. 2012 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 472 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Triton, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton. 2012 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1998 Ford Triton has manual transmission. 1998 Ford Triton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: