1998 Ford Triton vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 228 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Triton | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Triton | C30 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2640 mm |