1998 Ford Windstar vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1998 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 88 kg more than 1998 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Windstar | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Windstar | CTS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1842 mm |