1998 Ford Windstar vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Windstar would be higher. Both 1998 Ford Windstar and 2012 Cadillac CTS are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1998 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 58 kg more than 1998 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Ford Windstar | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Windstar | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1842 mm |
