1998 Holden Commodore vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Holden Commodore weights approximately 290 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1998 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Holden Commodore | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
Model | Commodore | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |