1998 Holden Nova vs. 1957 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1998 Holden Nova is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1957 Triumph TR3. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1957 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Holden Nova weights approximately 140 kg more than 1957 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Holden Nova | 1957 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Nova | TR3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2240 mm |