1998 Holden Nova vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1998 Holden Nova is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Holden Nova weights approximately 180 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Holden Nova (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Holden Nova | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Holden | Riley |
Model | Nova | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |