1998 Holden Nova vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Holden Nova is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1998 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1998 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 295 kg more than 1998 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Holden Nova | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | Nova | Cougar |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |