1998 Honda Passport vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 1998 Honda Passport is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Passport (190 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Passport should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Honda Passport | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Passport | 3.5 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 256 Nm | 276 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2820 mm |