1998 Honda Passport vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda Passport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda Passport would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1998 Honda Passport. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda Passport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Honda Passport | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Passport | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 273 HP |
| Torque | 256 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2875 mm |
