1998 Honda SSM vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 1998 Honda SSM is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (300 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda SSM. (286 Nm). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda SSM. 2004 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1998 Honda SSM has manual transmission. 1998 Honda SSM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Honda SSM | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | SSM | 75 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1951 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |