1998 Honda SSM vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Honda SSM | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | SSM | 6 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
