1998 Honda SSM vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda SSM. (286 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda SSM.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Honda SSM | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | SSM | 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2184 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2639 mm |