1998 Honda SSM vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 1998 Honda SSM is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (210 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Honda SSM | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
Model | SSM | Colt |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1500 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |