1998 Hyundai Satellite vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Hyundai Satellite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Hyundai Satellite would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1998 Hyundai Satellite. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1998 Hyundai Satellite.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Hyundai Satellite, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Hyundai Satellite. (161 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Hyundai Satellite.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Hyundai Satellite | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Hyundai | Jaguar |
Model | Satellite | XF |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2476 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 161 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2908 mm |