1998 Isuzu Hombre vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Isuzu Hombre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Isuzu Hombre would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Isuzu Hombre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Isuzu Hombre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Isuzu Hombre. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Isuzu Hombre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Isuzu Hombre | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Hombre | C70 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2639 mm |
