1998 Jaguar XJ8 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 848 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 (525 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XJ8 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ8 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3981 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2210 mm |