1998 Jaguar XJ8 vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XJ8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XJ8 would be higher. At 3,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (240 HP @ 6550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 665 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 Jaguar XJ8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XJ8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJ8 (525 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Jaguar XJ8 2009 Mazda Tribute
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XJ8 Tribute
Year Released 1998 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3981 cc 2959 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 290 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 6550 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.1 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2920 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]