1998 Jaguar XJR vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJR (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XJR | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | 140 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 370 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |