1998 Jaguar XJR vs. 1986 Lada Riva

To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada Riva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada Riva would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJR (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1986 Lada Riva. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada Riva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 777 kg more than 1986 Lada Riva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lada Riva. (122 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lada Riva. 1998 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1986 Lada Riva has manual transmission. 1986 Lada Riva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Jaguar XJR 1986 Lada Riva
Make Jaguar Lada
Model XJR Riva
Year Released 1998 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4000 cc 1569 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 370 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 122 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 79.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.1 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1837 kg 1060 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 4130 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2420 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]