1998 Jaguar XJR vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 511 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1998 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jaguar XJR | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XJR | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 370 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
