1998 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XJR (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (277 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Because 1998 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Jaguar | Saturn |
Model | XJR | Outlook |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 370 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |