1998 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XK is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 218 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XK | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |