1998 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (305 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 255 kg more than 2000 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (615 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XK | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jaguar | Opel |
Model | XK | Omega |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 445 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 615 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1310 kg |