1998 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion
To start off, 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XK weights approximately 830 kg more than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jaguar XK | 2005 Smart Cabrio Passion | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | XK | Cabrio Passion |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 697 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 33 L |
