1998 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 1998 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XK | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | XK | A6 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |