1998 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 BMW 3 Series

To start off, 2013 BMW 3 Series is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2013 BMW 3 Series. (238 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2013 BMW 3 Series.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 BMW 3 Series. (350 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 BMW 3 Series.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Jaguar XK 2013 BMW 3 Series
Make Jaguar BMW
Model XK 3 Series
Year Released 1998 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3995 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 290 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.7:1 10:01
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 8-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4636 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2031 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1429 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 60 L