1998 Jaguar XKR vs. 2000 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XKR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XKR would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XKR (370 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Because 1998 Jaguar XKR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XKR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XKR (542 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm). This means 1998 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jaguar XKR | 2000 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mini |
| Model | XKR | MK VII |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 370 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2040 mm |
