1998 Jaguar XKR vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XKR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XKR would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 902 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XKR (541 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jaguar XKR | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Jaguar | Smart |
Model | XKR | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 370 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 33 L |