1998 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 104 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1998 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jeep Cherokee | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cherokee | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2464 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
