1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 640 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (301 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Triumph |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3958 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
