1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane

To start off, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (247 HP @ 4050 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 580 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.

Because 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (468 Nm @ 3050 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee 1967 Mercury Park Lane
Make Jeep Mercury
Model Grand Cherokee Park Lane
Year Released 1998 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5899 cc 6990 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 247 HP 340 HP
Engine RPM 4050 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 468 Nm 626 Nm
Torque RPM 3050 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1940 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1430 mm