1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 640 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (301 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1993 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3958 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
