1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 310 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Because 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (469 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (468 Nm @ 3050 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Jeep | Aston Martin |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Vantage |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4050 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 469 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3050 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1260 mm |