1998 Kia Elan vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,768 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk (271 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk (515 Nm) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Kia | Studebaker |
| Model | Elan | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 5768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2980 mm |
