1998 Kia Elan vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Kia Elan | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Elan | R 360 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 16 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 22 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 1770 mm |