1998 Kia Elan vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac

To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.

Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan. 1963 Ford Zodiac has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1963 Ford Zodiac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: