1998 Kia Elan vs. 1972 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1972 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 NSU Ro 80. 1972 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Elan has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1972 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Kia | NSU |
| Model | Elan | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2860 mm |
