1998 Kia Elan vs. 1972 Plymouth Fury
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Plymouth Fury. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Plymouth Fury would be higher. At 7,205 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Plymouth Fury is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Plymouth Fury (225 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Plymouth Fury should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 1972 Plymouth Fury is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Plymouth Fury. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Plymouth Fury (477 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1972 Plymouth Fury will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Kia Elan | 1972 Plymouth Fury | |
| Make | Kia | Plymouth |
| Model | Elan | Fury |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 7205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 477 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3060 mm |
